Industry news

  • 18 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    There are many benefits associated with software virtualization, and the majority of Forrester clients have already started their virtualization journey. However, like any licensing metric, the devil is in the details; while buying virtualization can be confusing, staying compliant is the real headache. IT decision-makers responsible for sourcing & vendor management must understand the nuances of virtualization, as well as the different licensing rules and policies applied by different software vendors, if they want to ensure they stay compliant and avoid costly embarrassment at audit time.

    Virtualization is a powerful tool but needs careful handling.

    By virtualizing software, you can run multiple operating systems and multiple applications on one physical machine and across multiple processors and cores. Virtualization is performed by adding a piece of software that acts as an abstraction layer between the physical server and the virtual server (or virtual machines). This abstraction layer is known as a hypervisor; examples include Citrix XenServer, Microsoft Hyper-V, and VMware ESXi.

    Two key benefits of virtualization include: Firstly, it drives up the utilization of the physical machine. This allows you to do more work on fewer machines. The cost savings this provides are very attractive; it reduces the amount of physical hardware you need and it cuts hardware maintenance and power costs. Secondly, it makes it easier for IT to manage its infrastructure. Because virtual machines are essentially just software files, backing up, restoring, updating, or creating new users is a lot less time-consuming than having to do it on individual physical machines.

    Virtualization is an important development and a great driver toward cost savings and operational efficiencies. It does, however, require careful handling and monitoring as allowing virtualized software to proliferate in an uncontrolled manner will quickly lead to licensing compliance issues, audit embarrassment, and financial exposure.

    Three potential virtualization licensing pitfalls….

    In the good old days, software was a physical item and was assigned to a physical asset (e.g., a PC) on a one-to-one basis. It was, therefore, relatively easy to count physical assets in order to find out how many software licenses were installed. But as soon as virtualization broke the one-to-one relationship, counting actual license usage suddenly got much more challenging. Three challenges to keep in mind include:

    1. Software vendors license virtualization in different ways. To the detriment of the consumer, there is no industry standard for applying metrics to virtual scenarios. Some software companies try to ignore the issue and remain in the physical realm, while others devise conversion models based on peak resource use or running instances.

    2. IT focuses on operational performance, not licensing rules. At the point of buying, most sourcing and IT executives licensing knowledge is aligned and the vendor-specific nuances of virtualization are jointly understood. But as time goes by, this common understanding and knowledge falls by the wayside; IT returns to their main drivers of keeping the lights on while performance tuning their hardware estate in order to provide a satisfactory service to users.

    3. Keeping up-to-date with changing licensing rules is a full-time job. Most sourcing professionals are busy people and when not fighting fires are running hard to keep up with the demands of the business. As a result, it's easy to find yourself suddenly out of compliance.

    The three things you need to do in order to avoid these pitfalls ….

    It is a tough manual challenge for even a hawk-eyed sourcing and asset management executive to keep on top of license compliance in a virtualized world. Without constant due diligence and tools to help automate the management and monitoring of software, it's incredibly hard to be absolutely sure you are compliant. In order to get on top of this challenge, we recommend adopting the following best practices:

    1. Understand each vendor's virtualization rules. If you are virtualizing your software estate, assign someone in sourcing or asset management the job of understanding and keeping up-to-date with all the licensing rules relevant to each of the software products your organization uses. Vendors differ in the way they license their software in a virtual world. They also regularly change their licensing rules and, thus, to maintain compliance, you must be vigilant in watching for rule changes that may affect the way you use software.

    2. Communicate the licensing rules clearly and regularly to your IT colleagues. As time goes on, people's priorities change, they move on to other jobs, and new people arrive. This is business as usual and it's vital that the IT people who are responsible for installing and moving software are regularly updated with the various vendors' virtualization rules. This will stop inadvertent installations that breach the rules and will help maintain compliance.

    3. Use SLO tools. A new generation of software asset management (SAM) tools has been developed that automate and alleviate many of the challenges of staying compliant in a virtualized world. Authored by the likes of 1E, Aspera, Eracent, and Flexera Software, these products are delighting exasperated sourcing and asset managers around the world. The key factor here is that these SLO tools understand — and keep up-to-date with — each vendor's latest PURs and virtual use rights.

    There is no shortcut to ensuring your organization stays compliant in a virtualized world. You can't ignore the fact that virtual images are being spun up and multiplied by IT operations to satisfy user demand. Neither can you ignore the licensing rules each vendor applies. Forrester recommends you allocate time and/or resources to monitor and manage your use of virtualized software.

    Mark Bartrick is senior analyst at Forrester Research where he serves the information needs of, and contributes to the blog for, Sourcing & Vendor Management Professionals.

  • 18 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    Nokia has paid €1.7 billion to acquire full ownership of the shared joint Nokia Siemens Networks venture.

    The deal will see the Finish based Telecommunications giant acquire Siemens 50 percent stake if the move receives approval from regulatory authorities, having already been approved by both companies’ boards.

    Much of the infrastructure employed by the network will remain in place, with the operational headquarters remaining in Finland while the main hub will stay in Munich.

    Nokia has suffered significantly in recent years, as the company faces stiff competition with companies such as Samsung, Blackberry and Apple. Sales have fallen 20 percent year-on-year, with an overall net loss €272 million.

    Nokia to cut 10,000 jobs

    Nokia consolidates support and development with Tata

  • 18 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    Research from analyst firm Nelson Hall, has named outsourcing firm Sitel as a leading provider of global media services, in a report on social media.

    Sitel was also named in the report as a leader in delivering providing “customer experience enhancement” through social media, having acquired a 9.5 per cent market share.

    customer experience enhancement through social media had been a recently growing trend, growing rapidly over the past year.

    The report states demand for outsourced social media services is being driven by organisations which need to monitor and respond to posts on social channels.

    Mike Cook from Nelson Hall commented on the report, saying: “Sitel is delivering a suite of offerings and platforms that give it a competitive advantage within the social media market. They are offering social media as a valuable add-on to current CMS contracts and market social media to companies which have a diverse geographic mix.”

    Email Customer Service is Dying, say Sitel

    Sitel recognised for outsourcing expertise in awards shortlist

  • 17 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The National Audit Office (NAO) has released a report highlighting fears in the public sector regarding effective oversight of the delivery of superfast broadband by BT.

    The extent of the service rollout undertaken by BT has caused concern that public authorities will face difficulties in managing and overseeing the project.

    The NAO have also reported that the multi-million pound fiber optic infrastructure project is running behind schedule and without effective competition to check BT, who has succeeded in winning every available contract.

    The government have posted new targets for the rollout of superfast broadband after revised projections placed doubts on the ability to reach targets. The NAO said however that the: "government is not strong at taking remedial action to guard against further slippage".

    The NAO have also reported worries surrounding issues of overcharging by BT and the lack of resources available to councils to check future charges.

    NAO to investigate BT’s monopoly on rural broadband contracts

    NAO Highlights Risks in Government’s Infrastructure Plan

  • 17 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The Royal Bank of Scotland has rejected a bid from a joint proposal from U.S. equity firms JC Flowers and Apollo as the bank begins to narrow the bidding shortlist.

    The bidding process, which stems for RBS’ need to sell 315 stores as part of the conditions the bank accepted with a £45.8 million government bailout in 2008,

    Bidders are expecting to be contacted over the following days with information on the status of bids.

    Plans for a sale to Santander collapsed last October and RBS have said that a sale of the business is now unlikely to be finalised by the end of the year, moving to ask European regulators to extend the deadline from December 2013.

    RBS set aside £450 million for IT maintenance

    RBS says that UK government will be able to sell stake by mid 2014

  • 17 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    A critical part of the planning of your procurement overhaul is deciding the people who will be involved from within the business. This is something I spend my time advising companies on. Last year we worked closely with the Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust to help them reduce costs in the area of Reconstructive and Trauma Orthopaedics.

    We needed to make significant savings while upholding the high clinical reputation of the Trust, so we formed a cross-functional commercial and clinical team. This included a consultant, lead nurse, theatre ordering technician and us – the procurement team, a mixture of in-house and consultancy. The team would meet weekly and report directly to the Clinical Director, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer.

    What worked particularly well was that a joint team was able to exploit its collective clinical and commercial knowledge to unlock significant savings for the Trust. The number of suppliers and items has been reduced and the surgical team now has a clear picture of the costs of the products they routinely use and, through the engagement with surgeons, why certain procurement decisions have been made. This makes implementation of the changes that are required manageable while improving clinical outcomes.

    One aspect that is worth highlighting from this approach is that the negotiation was also a team approach. Fundamental to the achievement of savings was the united front presented to the supply market. Negotiations were conducted jointly by clinicians and procurement with senior executives involved in the final stages. This combined commitment achieved results.

    This model can be transferred to others businesses. When analysing what we did you’ll notice three important in-house groups:

    1. Procurement team

    2. Frontline of the business (in this case clinicians)

    3. Senior management

    By working in this way, change has a greater chance of success and is sustainable in the long term because each group has a role at the critical levels of the business: across from the top, the back office as well as customer facing.

    Next, in the final blog of this series, I will cover in-depth and with examples the potential benefits of taking on the challenge of changing your procurement processes.

    About Richard McIntosh

    Richard is Managing Director of INVERTO UK, an international management consultancy specialising in procurement. He has led and delivered many procurement consulting assignments, particularly strategic sourcing, organisation and process re-design and people and skills development. He has worked across many sectors, private, public and not-for-profit, leading procurement projects for clients such as Nokia, Visa, Aberdeen Asset Management, eircom, the Ministry of Defence and the NHS.

  • 16 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The recent scandal surrounding the overcharging of electronic tagging services has seen both public and private sectors coming under heavy criticism for the mishandling of procurement and mismanagement within contract governance.

    Private security giant G4S has been accused of overcharging and may now face a criminal investigation by the Serious Fraud Office, for the tracking of individuals who have moved abroad, returned to prison, or even died.

    G4S have pointed the finger at the government for failing to provide adequate data to be able to effectively identify those who should no longer be tagged, saying: "We will always stop charging when a curfew order formally ends. However, when no end date is given, as in bail cases, we have no legal authority to suspend or close a curfew order. We must receive specific instructions from the courts or a prison in these cases."

    The criticism levelled at the mishandling of the contract by the government echoes past failures by the civil services to cope with large procurement and outsourcing contracts.

    Chris Halward, Director at NOA Pathway and Professional Development discussing the G4S overcharging scandal on BBC radio 4 Today programme http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01cms9x …, described how skills need to be developed “to improve the skills that people have, in order to ensure that these services that are outsourced are outsourced effectively- it does work but you have to do it well and you have to ensure relationships are managed correctly.”

    The Today programme also addressed the issue of private firms being used as scapegoats by public sector departments, with failure in the public eye exaggerating failed contracts while successful projects often remain unnoticed.

    Both commenters agreed that the government has room for improvement in its handling of outsourced contracts. Tom Gash, Director of Research at the Institute for Government, said: “there really has to be a question about the government’s ability to manage these contracts, the Institute for Government’s research last year, showed that civil servants themselves weren’t very confident that they had the requisite skills.”

    G4S which already has a poor reputation for outsourcing within the public sector due to past scandals, including the provision of staff for the Olympic Games, saw shares fall, resulting in a loss of £240 million over the last few days.

  • 15 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    9 companies have been selected to operate a £100 million framework by the Scottish government designed to deliver procurement processes.

    The network will provide office equipment, machinery and supplies, alongside maintenance services.

    The contract will see the provision of equipment including photocopies, scanners and printers to public services, including all Scottish emergency services, educational facilities and government bodies.

    The new contract replaces a four-year contract established in 2009, with six of the suppliers being renewed under the new procurement contract, which has a length of two-years with the option a further two-year extension.

    The nine suppliers are Canon, Konica Minolta Business Solutions, Xerox, Capital Document Solutions, The Danwood Group, Toshiba TEC Imaging Systems, Ricoh, Capito and Newfield IT.

    The 2009 contract that the new procurement contract replaced achieved savings of 25 percent. The new contract is expected to be significant in meeting government targets on delivering multi-functional devices to public sector services.

    Scotland to announce 2013 investment strategy

    Scottish IT and digital businesses struggle to find skilled employees

  • 12 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    Efforts to find savings have seen the UK government moving to privatise procurement processes within the Ministry of Defence.

    While the move to outsource services routinely carried out by the Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) unit have not yet been confirmed, nearly 20 business groups have already expressed interest in the potential contracts.

    The contracts themselves would account for a significant proportion of the MoD’s £34.4 billion yearly budget.

    The decision to proceed with a outsourced procurement program now rests with the outcome of talks between the public sector and selected business groups.

    A move to an outsourced military procurement arrangement would represent a first of its kind, with private sector organisations working with major contractors such as BAE and EADS.

  • 11 Jul 2013 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    BT has secured a further rural broadband contract, signing a contract valued at £31.75 million with Dorset County Council.

    Once more BT has succeeded in keeping 100 percent of all public sector funding for the rural broadband framework.

    The contract with Dorset County Council will see BT provide £12.87 million of the total costs for the fibre optic network, while the council provides £9.44 million, while the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) unit matches this sum.

    The contract will see the installation of a high speed fibre optic network within three and a half years.

    Leader of Dorset County Council Spencer Flower, said: “We want everyone in Dorset to have access to reliable and faster broadband within the next three and a half years.”

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software