This regional seminar discussed how to develop the benefits of collaborative sourcing partnerships and deliver tangible value. Adrian Quayle, NOA Board member for the UK Regions, introduced the event along with the agenda which included topics such as relationship management approach – leave the contract to one side, improving communications between supplier and consumer, building trust – no holds barred truth sessions, reporting and measuring success and fostering a culture of mutual continuous improvement.
Glen Bertram, IBM, and Steve Saunders, Telefonica, presented their case study along the theme of ‘In it for the long term’ involving the outsourcing of infrastructure and 50 applications over a twelve year period. The current collaboration includes:
- Annual alignment of Telefonica UK’s business objectives with IBM’s delivery targets
- Agreement on the priority of maintaining the quality of production service through proactive monitoring and rigorous change management
- A shared, integrated and maintained program plan that enables visibility across all projects; reviewed jointly, in regular governance forums where dependencies are easily identified and conflicts quickly resolved
- Co-location of Telefonica UK’s governance team with the IBM delivery team to facilitate the development of close working relationships and a common understanding of business priorities and delivery challenges
- A commercial model incorporating gain-share to incentivise both organisations to reap the rewards of beating agreed targets
- Joint continuous improvement initiatives
Both Glen and Steve offered some top tips on lessons learnt through their collaboration so far. Be open and honest, share key information – good and bad, align objectives, adapt, invest in developing relationships, be one team (O2 IT + IBM) to the business, objective governance and measurement and remember results count.
Perran Jervis, Partner, TLT LLP, offered a legal perspective on sourcing partnerships incorporating creating partnerships through trust, leaving the contract to one side and incorporate principles in the contract such as effective governance protocols and effective performance management.
Perran said: “Transparency is key for governance to work at the outset and during the course of the relationship. Communication should be a dialogue with consistent auditing, reviewing and reporting throughout.
“A solid information protocol should also establish information types and distinguish levels of access to various types of information. Clarify should also be provided on how information is transferred, how information is held, how information is published, how information may be used, how confidentiality is maintained and how requests for freedom of information are dealt with.”
Perran emphasised the importance of a bespoke governance structure and dealing with multi-sourcing issues such as a multi-party OLA / Co-operation agreement, shared responsibility/accountability, customer enforcement, confidentiality / information sharing and unified change management process.
Perran said: “Performance management is also vitally important. Establish service levels which identify end-user's expectations, reflect key business objectives, assess risks and impact of failure, establish ability / capacity to manage performance and measure service received and Service Level Agreements and Key Performance Indicators (SLAs/KPIs).
Paul outlined the importance of incentivisation with the aim of not penalising and offered the following tips:
• Relative Performance Levels (RPLs)
- Effective competition amongst contractors
- Establish a minimum level of service
- SLAs become the standard not a notional target
- Benchmarking (functionality and cost)
- Reward co-operation
• Avoid the mismatch in expectation
- Rigid service levels
- Unrealistic prescribed damages
- Contractor will perceive service levels and KPIs as the target
Paul concluded: “Contract structure should also be flexible and contain regular and relevant reporting. Constant monitoring and measurement of performance data is needed by both parties and effective incentives to collaborate in order to achieve project objective.”
Tim Leaver, Chief Procurement Officer, and Lorna Baker, Senior Procurement Manager, presented the Land Registry’s approach to relationship management. 70 per cent of Land Registry annual spend is covered by longer term contracts (indirects e.g. ICT, estates, FM). Contract / supplier management is hugely important and in these days of austerity - suppliers are key to “getting more for less”.
Lorna gained a valuable insight into the views and opinions of suppliers during her NOA Diploma research which may not have been quite such an open and honest dialogue outside the security of the research process. She built a network of professionals working on both sides of the outsourcing relationship who are keen to see Outsourcing deliver strategic improvement to their organisations’ and work together to demonstrate that Outsourcing, when done well, can deliver cost savings, efficiency and innovation to the benefit of the entire industry.
Why do relationships break down?
• A failure in communication at any one of the points of the cycle will result in damage to the relationship which will be fundamental enough to impact on all the other aspects
• Key personnel do not have to be senior personnel, but the people who can have most influence on behaviours. Often these are people who are considered to be in ‘lower’ grades or positions
• It is easier to look outwards at the supplier that is failing than looking inwards at how the customer is contributing or even causing failure
• Once face-saving behaviour has started, a complete breakdown in trust will result, and without the desire and capability to improve trust and relationships, staff may need to be removed (on both sides)
• Awareness of organisational culture is important
Transferable Lessons from Academic Theory to Day-to-day Work
• We should be aware of the views and opinions of our suppliers about us as a customer. Not just by listening to the formal feedback, but by taking on constructive feedback and working with them to improve how we work
• We should be honest with ourselves and others about our skills and abilities
• When we outsource we are often changing the roles of the contract management team significantly. A great IT programmer may require training to gain the skills required to act as a contract manager
• We must not micro-manage the contract out of habit. While we have a responsibility to work with suppliers and monitor what they do, we have outsourced for a reason and they must be empowered to deliver in accordance with their expertise
• We must not be afraid to challenge when necessary, although this should be done professionally and not be antagonistic or aggressive or it will create face-saving behaviour
• We should not be complacent when things are going well for us. We need to ensure that things are continuously improving and that delivery of the goods, works or services is aspirational - to be better every time
Land Registry’s Outcomes
• Significant improvement in relationships
• Charter or JSI provides ‘non contractual’ focus
• Follow up important
- Ensure actions completed
- Track relationship through normal performance management
• Nip any recurrence in the bud
Sourcing Partnerships Breakout Sessions
The seminar concluded with a choice of interactive sessions where attendees were encouraged to participate and share experiences and best practice. A choice selection of the key outcomes is listed below.
How do you structure a sourcing partnership at the start to encourage collaborative working?
• Governance
• Protection
• Support
• Operation input into negotiation and procurement process
• Recognise importance of culture
• Provide suitable management for customer
• Dealing with TUPE / retaining reemployment of existing staff. Avoid duplication
• Calibration with the customer business project team first – then the supplier
• As far as possible, define collaborative behaviour for both parties
• Educate your own staff
• Include the objectives in the contract
When issues arise after the partnership has started, how do you get them back on track?
• Acknowledge there is a problem and communicate feedback!
• The work to be done and capability to deliver
- The agreement may not have been the right one
- Locked in
- Not commercially fair or sustainable
- ‘Bitten off more than able to chew’
• Beliefs and behaviour
- Fear of exposing the issue
- What we can and can’t say
• Risk
- Different appetites for risk
• Implementing expectations
- Managing expectations of quality
- Reality of whether a contract can be delivered
- Disengaging business customers due to outsourcing
• Impact whether problem is not solved
- Loss of value
- Loss of reputation
- Risk
• Long term attitude to fixing problem
- Accountability
- Agree way forward and the end goal
• How to measure progress
- How you will jointly govern
- Have one version of the truth
- Involve the senior sponsors
- Relax boundaries
- Support decision
- Break assumptions about what can be done
- Show commitment
• Create a reasonable plan
- Which is understood
- Can commit to
- Will step change items
- Capable of delivering
For the full set of slides from this event, please visit www.noa.co.uk